Skip to main content

Teaching Math for Social Justice

Math education is never unbiased. The contexts of word problems in math classrooms present information from a certain perspective. For example, a question of a pizza box poses students as consumers who eat unhealthy food. Even if the question asked about a healthier food such as quinoa, or kale, there is a factor of a local/global impact - water usage and labour - from the consumption of these particular foods. Of course, information as such is left out of such a problem, and hence we unknowingly, we are teach our students to become ignorant consumers.

Stocker presents a smorgasbord of lessons that discuss many social justice topics and provides a way for any teacher to apply to their curriculum. He advises teachers to start with a topic that they would feel comfortable discussing, and to go from there. Although this may seem harmless, it may soon become tricky to navigate if the teacher has not been well-informed of how to facilitate these discussions. It could become a sticky situation if the teacher approaches topics such as racism or sexuality with students of color in the classroom or of differing sexual orientations and gender identities, and has not developed the sensitivity to create a safe environment for dialogue in the classroom.


Comments

  1. True -- but don't all teachers have the responsibility of developing sensitivity around these important topics for our students? Why should math teachers be 'exempt'? I do understand what you're saying though... and social studies and literature teachers do make it their business to be informed about these things more often.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I strongly agree, all teachers have the responsibility of developing sensitivity around these topics, and math teachers should certainly not be 'exempt'. I should have followed up my last comment; there should be more resources for teachers - or perhaps an implementation in teacher prep programs/prof dev. - for the importance of and skills in how to tackle social issues in the classroom.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Reflections on Elliot W. Eisner's "Three Curricula that Schools Teach"

Eisner sets out to explain the three curricula taught by schools, including the 1. Explicit curriculum - what is made public through course announcements 2. Implicit curriculum - the socialization through physical and behavioural structures of the school and classroom 3. Null curriculum - what is left out from our explicit curriculum Through his theory of implicit education, Eisner makes his case that is it usually more important for a student to study the teacher, rather than the course content, in an attempt to achieve a good grade. The students reads the environment created by the teacher to establish to determine how much effort they should put into a class, particularly in systems that use behaviour modification techniques. How is it that we should go about cultivating student initiative and to develop intrinsic motivation so that students find the joy of learning for themselves, rather than to please their community - teachers, parents, and peers - through their achievements...

Microteaching reflection

Yesterday, in small groups, we taught each other micro-lessons around a topic that was non-math/non-curricula. I decided to teach a lesson on a figure skating: waltz jump (on the ground) - Lesson plan in previous post. Reflecting upon the experience, I was a little nervous throughout the process, teaching a skill that I had done over and over again, but had not thought much about the learning of the process in over ten years. Although a clear lesson plan was drawn out, I did not review it as much as I should have, and smaller details were omitted. (Waltz jump along the arc of a circle and connects to the edges used.) My peers seemed to enjoy the task of learning about the skating boot, knee health, and performing the jump, and all written comments were positive. I ran out of material at the end, and as this was as far as I had done in figure skating, I wasn't entirely sure how to proceed from there. (This shows in two feed back forms that indicated that my area of improvement was...

But do you really understand?

In response to Richard Skemp's article on Relational Understanding and Instrumental Understanding (available here ) The Skemp article prompted me to consider my own experiences in learning and teaching Mathematics, particularly in my home country, New Zealand. New Zealand has national assessment/certification for  all  high school subjects, the National Certificate of Educational Achievement (NCEA). All Year 11, 12, and 13 students - the final three years of high school - studying the same subject and level, will take the same exam at the end of the year, at exactly the same time. Due the set type of questions, year after year, teachers have become accustomed to teaching for the exam, more often than not, for instrumental understanding. Although the NCEA administration have made small changes to the exams year to year, in hopes of creating space for teachers to teach for more relational understanding, this is not always the case. I, myself, have been guilty for tutoring c...