Skip to main content

Teacher Perspective Inventory


 I took the TPI test twice, the first time through the lens of myself after my first year as a high school music teacher, and the second time as a mathematics tutor and prospective math classroom teacher. 


Other than answering questions on the five perspectives differently, I also tried to vary my responses more dramatically the second time.














Fig. 1. TPI results as a Music Educator





 Fig. 2. TPI results as a Math Educator

I would agree with the overall result that perspective that I find strongest is Nurturing; my greatest aim in teaching, no matter what subjects, is for students to develop a sense of confidence - the bravery to reach for goals, and the realisation that the capacity they have for impact. Mistake making is an important part of my teaching philosophy, particularly music where one's mistake is audibly heard by the rest of the group. It's imperative for my students change their mindset from embarrassment to embracement of their mistakes, and to accept each other for stumbling in the process of learning.  

Most surprising that social reform sat so low in comparison. As someone who has worked as an activist in racial, sexual orientation, and gender diversity, having low social reform in my teaching was quite disappointing, though it may be true. I may not make enough of a conscious effort to incorporate aspects of social action through my curriculum and pedagogy.

The most drastic change in the two tables is in the Apprenticeship perspective. I would certainly agree that with Mathematics, I am much more aware of my students' capabilities , and that I constantly challenge them to work in the 'zone of development.' It interests me how I might also develop ways of teaching that engages my students to work at the same capacity.









Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Reflections on Elliot W. Eisner's "Three Curricula that Schools Teach"

Eisner sets out to explain the three curricula taught by schools, including the 1. Explicit curriculum - what is made public through course announcements 2. Implicit curriculum - the socialization through physical and behavioural structures of the school and classroom 3. Null curriculum - what is left out from our explicit curriculum Through his theory of implicit education, Eisner makes his case that is it usually more important for a student to study the teacher, rather than the course content, in an attempt to achieve a good grade. The students reads the environment created by the teacher to establish to determine how much effort they should put into a class, particularly in systems that use behaviour modification techniques. How is it that we should go about cultivating student initiative and to develop intrinsic motivation so that students find the joy of learning for themselves, rather than to please their community - teachers, parents, and peers - through their achievements...
1 comment
Read more

Microteaching reflection

Yesterday, in small groups, we taught each other micro-lessons around a topic that was non-math/non-curricula. I decided to teach a lesson on a figure skating: waltz jump (on the ground) - Lesson plan in previous post. Reflecting upon the experience, I was a little nervous throughout the process, teaching a skill that I had done over and over again, but had not thought much about the learning of the process in over ten years. Although a clear lesson plan was drawn out, I did not review it as much as I should have, and smaller details were omitted. (Waltz jump along the arc of a circle and connects to the edges used.) My peers seemed to enjoy the task of learning about the skating boot, knee health, and performing the jump, and all written comments were positive. I ran out of material at the end, and as this was as far as I had done in figure skating, I wasn't entirely sure how to proceed from there. (This shows in two feed back forms that indicated that my area of improvement was...
Post a Comment
Read more

But do you really understand?

In response to Richard Skemp's article on Relational Understanding and Instrumental Understanding (available here ) The Skemp article prompted me to consider my own experiences in learning and teaching Mathematics, particularly in my home country, New Zealand. New Zealand has national assessment/certification for  all  high school subjects, the National Certificate of Educational Achievement (NCEA). All Year 11, 12, and 13 students - the final three years of high school - studying the same subject and level, will take the same exam at the end of the year, at exactly the same time. Due the set type of questions, year after year, teachers have become accustomed to teaching for the exam, more often than not, for instrumental understanding. Although the NCEA administration have made small changes to the exams year to year, in hopes of creating space for teachers to teach for more relational understanding, this is not always the case. I, myself, have been guilty for tutoring c...
Post a Comment
Read more