Skip to main content

But do you really understand?

In response to Richard Skemp's article on Relational Understanding and Instrumental Understanding (available here)

The Skemp article prompted me to consider my own experiences in learning and teaching Mathematics, particularly in my home country, New Zealand. New Zealand has national assessment/certification for all high school subjects, the National Certificate of Educational Achievement (NCEA). All Year 11, 12, and 13 students - the final three years of high school - studying the same subject and level, will take the same exam at the end of the year, at exactly the same time. Due the set type of questions, year after year, teachers have become accustomed to teaching for the exam, more often than not, for instrumental understanding. Although the NCEA administration have made small changes to the exams year to year, in hopes of creating space for teachers to teach for more relational understanding, this is not always the case. I, myself, have been guilty for tutoring certain students for instrumental understanding, particularly when the student is at risk of failing an upcoming exam. 

Skemp emphasizes the importance of understanding and aligning the goals of the teacher and the student. Most commonly, the teacher's goals are for higher rates of student achievement, and the student's goals are to pass their exams. In this situation, the larger issue is to differentiate between education, where the goal is to create more curiosity for critical thinking, regardless of the subject, and training, where the goal is to gain knowledge and skillset in a particular field. If both the teacher and student make it their priority to expand upon their ways of thinking that will apply across multiple disciplines, rather than teaching/learning a set of formulas to answer particular problems, they can create a basis for developing the schema where the student becomes a curious learner.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Reflections on Elliot W. Eisner's "Three Curricula that Schools Teach"

Eisner sets out to explain the three curricula taught by schools, including the 1. Explicit curriculum - what is made public through course announcements 2. Implicit curriculum - the socialization through physical and behavioural structures of the school and classroom 3. Null curriculum - what is left out from our explicit curriculum Through his theory of implicit education, Eisner makes his case that is it usually more important for a student to study the teacher, rather than the course content, in an attempt to achieve a good grade. The students reads the environment created by the teacher to establish to determine how much effort they should put into a class, particularly in systems that use behaviour modification techniques. How is it that we should go about cultivating student initiative and to develop intrinsic motivation so that students find the joy of learning for themselves, rather than to please their community - teachers, parents, and peers - through their achievements...

Lesson Plan for Figure Skating: Waltz Jump

Lesson Plan Date: 10/18/2017 Grade/Class: EDCP342A Length: 10 minutes 1. Measurable Objective(s): Students will be able to: Identify the edges on a skating boot/blade Practice a healthy use of the knee to bend and jump Perform a waltz jump on the ground 2. Required Prior Knowledge and Skills: • Walking • Balance on one foot 3. Review Needed: • None 4. Materials, Repertoire, Equipment needed: • Ice skates 5. Agenda: Ice Skate Anatomy Edges, Weight, and Momentum Jump Prep Completing the jump 6. Le...

Microteaching reflection

Yesterday, in small groups, we taught each other micro-lessons around a topic that was non-math/non-curricula. I decided to teach a lesson on a figure skating: waltz jump (on the ground) - Lesson plan in previous post. Reflecting upon the experience, I was a little nervous throughout the process, teaching a skill that I had done over and over again, but had not thought much about the learning of the process in over ten years. Although a clear lesson plan was drawn out, I did not review it as much as I should have, and smaller details were omitted. (Waltz jump along the arc of a circle and connects to the edges used.) My peers seemed to enjoy the task of learning about the skating boot, knee health, and performing the jump, and all written comments were positive. I ran out of material at the end, and as this was as far as I had done in figure skating, I wasn't entirely sure how to proceed from there. (This shows in two feed back forms that indicated that my area of improvement was...