Skip to main content

But do you really understand?

In response to Richard Skemp's article on Relational Understanding and Instrumental Understanding (available here)

The Skemp article prompted me to consider my own experiences in learning and teaching Mathematics, particularly in my home country, New Zealand. New Zealand has national assessment/certification for all high school subjects, the National Certificate of Educational Achievement (NCEA). All Year 11, 12, and 13 students - the final three years of high school - studying the same subject and level, will take the same exam at the end of the year, at exactly the same time. Due the set type of questions, year after year, teachers have become accustomed to teaching for the exam, more often than not, for instrumental understanding. Although the NCEA administration have made small changes to the exams year to year, in hopes of creating space for teachers to teach for more relational understanding, this is not always the case. I, myself, have been guilty for tutoring certain students for instrumental understanding, particularly when the student is at risk of failing an upcoming exam. 

Skemp emphasizes the importance of understanding and aligning the goals of the teacher and the student. Most commonly, the teacher's goals are for higher rates of student achievement, and the student's goals are to pass their exams. In this situation, the larger issue is to differentiate between education, where the goal is to create more curiosity for critical thinking, regardless of the subject, and training, where the goal is to gain knowledge and skillset in a particular field. If both the teacher and student make it their priority to expand upon their ways of thinking that will apply across multiple disciplines, rather than teaching/learning a set of formulas to answer particular problems, they can create a basis for developing the schema where the student becomes a curious learner.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Final thoughts...

As someone who has spent years tutoring mathematics, but not having taught math in the public school setting/formal school classroom, I found this term studying secondary math instruction methods engaging. I was excited to have learnt about the various methods of engaging students, particularly through interdisciplinary investigations, such as math and art projects. Over the course of this term, I spent time rediscovering my past and current identity as a mathematical person, as I have not pursued mathematics in several years. Many of my assumptions about the learning of mathematics stems from my experiences as a math learner in high school and university. I recognize the journey ahead to broaden my experiences in the teaching and learning of mathematics.  I was also able to draw parallels and differences between the New Zealand Mathematics Curriculum, which I studied under, and the previous, current, and incoming BC curriculum. This course, along with attending the BCAMT confe...
1 comment
Read more

Reflections on Elliot W. Eisner's "Three Curricula that Schools Teach"

Eisner sets out to explain the three curricula taught by schools, including the 1. Explicit curriculum - what is made public through course announcements 2. Implicit curriculum - the socialization through physical and behavioural structures of the school and classroom 3. Null curriculum - what is left out from our explicit curriculum Through his theory of implicit education, Eisner makes his case that is it usually more important for a student to study the teacher, rather than the course content, in an attempt to achieve a good grade. The students reads the environment created by the teacher to establish to determine how much effort they should put into a class, particularly in systems that use behaviour modification techniques. How is it that we should go about cultivating student initiative and to develop intrinsic motivation so that students find the joy of learning for themselves, rather than to please their community - teachers, parents, and peers - through their achievements...
1 comment
Read more

Math Art: Knot Mosaics

Peter Gustainis and I worked together to recreate Felicia Tabing's Knotical . We created the 4 tiles digitally to represent her artwork presented at Bridges Math Art 2017, then arranged the tiles in the same fashion as her original block print.To extend this artwork, we incorporated colours associated with Andy Warhol's work with pop art, giving each tile a different gradient. This allowed for a clearer representation of the transformations (symmetry, rotation, translation) present in this artwork. As you can see in the color schemes below, the work almost has a complete rotational symmetry. As a challenge, we provided an activity where students were given a set of tiles and asked to represent 2 common knots - Solomon, and Trefoil - mosaically. Here is the link to our Google Slides presentation This project was a fun inquiry to the ways that we can teach mathematical concepts alongside concepts in aesthetics - the ways that mathematicians create art through vis...
Post a Comment
Read more